Skip to content
All Case Studies
IntermediateDisk ForensicsWindows ArtifactsCorporate Investigation

The Departing Engineer: Tracing IP Theft Through USB Artifacts and Shellbags

A senior engineer resigned and joined a direct competitor within a week. Windows shell artifacts and USB registry entries reconstructed exactly what he took on his way out.

Background

A mid-size industrial design firm suspected that a senior mechanical engineer had copied proprietary CAD files before resigning to join a direct competitor. Legal counsel authorized a forensic examination of the employee's company-issued laptop under the terms of the signed IT acceptable-use policy, which permitted post-employment device review.

Evidence Seized

  • Dell Latitude company laptop (Windows 11, BitLocker enabled with recoverable key in escrow)
  • Domain login and VPN access logs for the 30 days preceding resignation
  • Corporate file-server access logs (SMB share audit trail)

Tools Used

  • FTK Imager (imaging)
  • Autopsy + Registry Explorer (artifact analysis)
  • USB Detective (USB history correlation)
  • log2timeline / Plaso (super-timeline)

Methodology

  • Escrowed BitLocker recovery key retrieved from Active Directory and used to mount the volume for imaging without altering the source disk.
  • Created a forensic image with FTK Imager and verified SHA-256 hash matched pre- and post-acquisition.
  • Parsed SYSTEM and SOFTWARE registry hives to enumerate USBSTOR and USB device history — vendor ID, serial number, first/last connection timestamps.
  • Extracted shellbags from NTUSER.DAT and UsrClass.dat to reconstruct folder-browsing history, including folders that had since been deleted from disk.
  • Cross-referenced shellbag folder-access timestamps against USB connection windows to identify which folders were browsed while a specific USB serial number was attached.
  • Reviewed Jump Lists and LNK files for direct evidence of specific CAD files being opened from the removable volume.
  • Built a super-timeline in Plaso combining registry, filesystem MACB times, and event logs to present a single defensible narrative.

Key Artifacts Found

  • Three distinct USB mass-storage device serial numbers connected in the 72 hours before resignation, none previously seen in six months of history
  • Shellbags showing navigation into a folder named 'Confidential_Prototype_2025' that was deleted from the local disk but never existed on the removable media's file allocation table snapshot at seizure
  • Jump List entries referencing eleven specific .SLDPRT (SolidWorks part) files opened directly from a drive letter matching one of the flagged USB serials
  • $LogFile and $UsnJrnl entries showing bulk file creation events in a temp folder followed by rapid deletion, consistent with staging files before copying and cleaning up afterward

Challenges

  • BitLocker required coordinating with IT to retrieve the escrowed recovery key before imaging could begin, adding a two-day delay that had to be documented in the chain-of-custody log.
  • The employee had run a registry cleaner utility, which complicated — but did not defeat — USBSTOR reconstruction, since MountedDevices and setupapi.dev.log retained corroborating entries.
  • Shellbags alone don't prove file copying occurred, only that folders were browsed; this had to be clearly caveated in the report and paired with Jump List and $UsnJrnl evidence for a complete picture.

Outcome

The combined artifact timeline was sufficient for outside counsel to send a cease-and-desist supported by specific, dated technical findings. The matter was resolved through a confidential settlement before litigation was filed.

Lessons Learned

No single artifact type proves data exfiltration on its own — shellbags, USB history, Jump Lists, and journal records each have narrow individual meaning but corroborate powerfully when triangulated into one timeline. Escrowing full-disk-encryption recovery keys before an incident occurs is what made rapid imaging possible at all.

This case has been anonymized and fictionalized for confidentiality. Names, identifiers, and specific circumstances have been altered or composited; any resemblance to a real investigation is coincidental.